SU(2) representation

This article is one of Lie Group & Representation contents.


The SU(2) algebra is [J_i,J_k]=i\epsilon_{ikl} J_l


J_3 eigenstates

goal: reduce the Hilbert space to block diagonal form.

We can diagonalize only one element, choose J_3.

Then pick the states with the highest value of J_3, and call that value as j.

J_3 \left| i, \alpha\right\rangle = j\left| j,\alpha \right\rangle

where \alpha is another label.

Also we can choose the states so that \left\langle j,\alpha | j,\beta \right\rangle = \delta_{\alpha \beta}



Raising and Lowering Operators

Define raising and lowering operators, J^\pm = (J_1 \pm J_2) / \sqrt{2}

satisfying [J_3, J^\pm]=\pm J^\pm,\ [J^+, J^-]=J_3
so they raise and lower the value of J_3 on the states. If J_3 \left| m \right\rangle = m \left| m \right\rangle
then J_3 J^\pm \left| m \right\rangle = J^\pm J_3 \left| m \right\rangle \pm J^\pm \left| m \right\rangle = (m \pm 1) J^\pm \left| m \right\rangle

The key idea is that we can use the raising and lowering operators to construct the irreducible representations.


There is no state with J_3 = j+1 because we have assumed that j is the highest value of J_3. Thus is must be that J^+ \left| j, \alpha \right\rangle = 0\ \forall \alpha

because any non-zero states would have J_3 = j+1. THe states obtained by acting with the lowering operator have J_3=j-1, so it makes sense to define J^- \left| j,\alpha \right\rangle \equiv N_j (\alpha) \left| j-1, \alpha \right\rangle
where N_j(\alpha) is a normalization factor. But we easily see that states with different \alpha are orthogonal, because N_j(\beta)^*N_j(\alpha)\left\langle j-1, \beta | j-1, \alpha \right\rangle = \left\langle j, \beta \right| J^+ J^- \left| j,\alpha \right\rangle = \left\langle j, \beta \right| [J^+ J^-] \left| j, \alpha \right\rangle = \left\langle j, \beta \right| J_3 \left| j,\alpha \right\rangle = j\left\langle j, \beta | j, \alpha \right\rangle = j \delta_{\alpha \beta}

Thus we can choos the states \left| j-1, \alpha \right\rangle to be the orthonormal by choosing N_j(\alpha) = \sqrt{j} \equiv N_j

Then we have J^+ \left| j-1, \alpha \right\rangle = \frac{1}{N_j} J^+ J^- \left| j,\alpha \right\rangle = \frac{1}{N_j} [J^+, J^-] \left| j, \alpha \right\rangle = \frac{j}{N_j} \left| j, \alpha \right\rangle = N_j \left| j, \alpha \right\rangle

Now there are orthonormal states \left| j-2, \alpha \right\rangle satisfying J^- \left| j-1, \alpha \right\rangle = N_{j-1} \left| j-2, \alpha \right\rangle \\ J^- \left| j-2, \alpha \right\rangle = N_{j-1} \left| j-1, \alpha \right\rangle

Continuing the process, we find a whole tower of orthonormal states, \left| j - k, \alpha \right\rangle satisfying J^- \left| j-k, \alpha \right\rangle = N_{j-K} \left| j-k-1, \alpha \right\rangle \\ J^+ \left| j-k-1, \alpha \right\rangle = N_{j-k} \left| j-k, \alpha \right\rangle

The Ns can be chosen to be real, and because of the algebra, they satisfy N_{j-k}^2 = \left\langle j-k,\alpha \right| J^+ J^- \left| j - k,\alpha \right\rangle = \left\langle j-k, \alpha \right| [J^+, J^-] \left| j-k, \alpha \right\rangle + \left\langle j - k, \alpha \right| J^-J^+ \left| j-k, \alpha \right\rangle = N_{j-k+1}^2 + j-k

This is a recursion relation for the Ns which is easy to solve by starting with N_j: \begin{align*} N_j^2 & &=j \\ N_{j-1}^2 &- N_j^2 &= j-1 \\  \vdots & & \vdots \\ N_{j-k}^2 &- N_{j-k+1}^2 &= j-k \\ \hline  N_{j-k}^2 & = (k+1)j & -  k(k+1)/2 \\ & = \frac{1}{2}(k+1)(2j-k) & \end{align*}

or setting k=j-m N_m = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sqrt{(j+m)(j-m+1)}

Because the representation is finite dimensional, there must be some maximum number of lowering operators, l, that we can apply to \left| j,\alpha \right\rangle. We must eventually come to some m=j-l such that applying any more lowering operators gives 0. Then l is a non-negative integer specifying the number of times we can lower the states with highest J_3. Another lowering operator annihilates the state J^- \left| j-l, \alpha \right\rangle = 0

But then the norm of J^- \left| j-l, \alpha \right\rangle must vanish, which means that N_{j-l} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sqrt{(2j-l)(l+1)} = 0
the factor l+1 cannot vanish, thus we must have l=2j

Finally, we don't need \alpha, because generator don't touch \alpha. \alpha become label of each irreducible representation.



The Standard Notation

Standard notation of irreducible representations label highest J_3 value in the representation and the J_3 value: \left| j,m \right\rangle

and the matrix elements of the generators are determined by the matrix elements of J_3 and the raising and lowering operators, J^\pm: \left\langle j,m' \right| J_3 \left| j,m \right\rangle = m\delta_{m'm}\\ \left\langle j,m' \right\rangle J^+ \left| j,m \right\rangle = \sqrt{(j+m+1)(j-m)/2} \delta_{m',m+1}\\ \left\langle j,m' \right| J^- \left| j,m \right\rangle = \sqrt{(j+m)(j-m+1)/2} \delta_{m',m-1}

These matrix elements define the spin j represenatation of the SU(2) algebra: [J^j_a]_{kl} = \left\langle j,j+1-k \right| J_a \left| j,j+1-l\right\rangle

If we use different convention with m and m', [J_a^j]_{m'm} = \left\langle j,m' \right| J_a \left| j,m\right\rangle

where m and m' run from j to -j in steps of -1


For example, for 1/2, this gives the spin 1/2 representation J_1^{1/2} = \frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0\end{pmatrix} = \frac{1}{2} \sigma_1 \\ J_2^{1/2} = \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i \\ i & 0\end{pmatrix} = \frac{1}{2}\sigma_2 \\ J_3^{1/2} = \frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix} = \frac{1}{2} \sigma_3

where the \sigmas are the Pauli matrices.

\sigma_1 = \begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}, \sigma_2 = \begin{pmatrix}0&-i\\i&0\end{pmatrix}, \sigma_3=\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}

satrisfying \sigma_a \sigma_b = \delta_{ab} + i\epsilon_{abc} \sigma_c

The spin 1/2 representation is the defining(or fundamental) represeantation of SU(2)

Then group element can represented by e^{i\vec{\alpha} \cdot \vec{\sigma}/2}

which are the most general 2\times 2 unitary matrices with determinant 1.


For another example, spin 1 representation looks like J_1^1=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}0&1&1\\1&0&1\\0&1&0\end{pmatrix},\ J_2^1=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}0&-i&0\\i&0&-i\\0&i&0\end{pmatrix},\  J_3^1=\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\0&0&0\\0&0&-1\end{pmatrix}

.

This is adjoint representation with f_{abc} = \epsilon_{abc}.


In general, the J_3 values are called weights, and this process is highest weight construction.

1. Diagonlaize J_3.

2. Find the states with the highest J_3 value j.

3. For each such state, explicitly construct the states of the irreducible spin j representation by applying the lowering operator to the states with highest J_3.

4. Now set aside the subspace spanned by these representations, which is now in canonical form, and concentrate on the subspace orthogonal to it.

5. THake these remaining states, go to step 2 and start again with the states with next highest J_3 value.


The end result will be the construction of a basis for the Hilbert space of the form \left| j,m,\alpha \right\rangle

where m and j refer to the J_3 value and the representation as usual and \alpha refers to all the other observables that can be diagonalized to characterize the state. These satify \left\langle j', m', \alpha' | j,m,\alpha \right\rangle = \delta_{m'm} \delta_{j'j} \delta_{\alpha' \alpha}

They are also required by Schur's lemma, becauses the matrix elements satisfy \left\langle j',m',\alpha' \right| J_a \left| j,m,\alpha \right\rangle = [J_a^{j'}]_{m'm''} \left\langle j',m'',\alpha' | j,m,\alpha\right\rangle = \left\langle j',m',\alpha' | j,m'',\alpha\right\rangle [J_a^j]_{m''m}

because we can insert a complete set of intermediate states on either side of J_a. Thus \left\langle j',m',\alpha'|j,m,\alpha\right\rangle commutes with all the elements of an irreducible representation, and is either 0 if j\ne j' or proportional to the identity, \delta_{m'm} if j=j'.



Tensor Products

This is just addition of angular momentum.

Product of two different kinds of kets is \left| i, x \right\rangle \equiv \left| i \right\rangle \left| x \right\rangle

where the first states, \left| i \right\rangle transforms under representation D_1 of the group and the second, \left| x \right\rangle, under D_2. Then the product, called the tensor product, transforms as follows: D(g)\left| i,x\right\rangle = \left| j,y \right\rangle [D_{1\otimes 2} (g)]_{iyix}=\left| j \right\rangle \left| y \right\rangle [D_1(g)]_{ji}[D_2(g)]_{yx}=(\left| j \right\rangle [D_1(g)]_{ji}) (\left| y \right\rangle [D_2(g)]_{yx})

Let's look at this near the identity, for infinitesimal \alpha_a, (1+i\alpha_a J_a)\left| i,x\right\rangle = \left| j,y\right\rangle \left\langle j,y \right| (1+i\alpha_a J_a)\left| i,x \right\rangle = \left| j,y \right\rangle ( \delta_{ji} \delta_{yx} + i\alpha_a [J_a^{1\otimes 2} (g)]_{iyix})=\left| j,y \right\rangle (\delta_{ji} + i\alpha_a [J_a^1]+{ji})(\delta_{yx} + i\alpha_a [J_a^2]_{yx})

Thus identifying first powers of \alpha_a: [J_a^{1\otimes 2}(g)]_{jyix} = [J^1_a]_{ji}\delta_{yx} + \delta_{ji}[J_a^2]_{yx}

We can understand J_a operator operate each space, J_a(\left| j \right\rangle \left| x \right\rangle) = (J_a \left| j \right\rangle ) \left| x \right\rangle + \left| j \right\rangle (J_a \left| x \right\rangle)



J_3 value add

The J_3 values of tensor product states are just the sums of the J_3 values of the factors: J_3(\left| j_1, m_1\right\rangle \left| j_2, m_2 \right\rangle ) = (m_1+m_2)(\left| j_1, m_1\right\rangle \left| j_2, m_2\right\rangle)

 


For example, the tensor product of a spin 1/2 and spin 1 represenation.

There is a unique highest weight state, \left| 3/2, 3/2 \right\rangle = \left| 1/2, 1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,1\right\rangle

We can now construct the rest of the spin 3/2 states by applying lowering operators to both sides. For example, J^-\left| 3/2, 3/2 \right\rangle = J^- (\left| 1/2, 1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,1\right\rangle )=\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}\left| 3/2,1/2\right\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}} \left| 1/2,-1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,1\right\rangle + \left| 1/2,1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,0\right\rangle

or \left| 3/2,1/2 \right\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}} \left| 1/2,-1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,1 \right\rangle + \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}} \left\| 1/2, 1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,0\right\rangle

Continuing the process gives \left| 3/2, -1/2 \right\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\left| 1/2, -1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,0\right\rangle + \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\left| 1/2,1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,-1\right\rangle \\ \left| 3/2,-3/2\right\rangle = \left| 1/2, -1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,-1\right\rangle

Then the remaining states are orthogonal to these \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\left| 1/2, -1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,1\right\rangle - \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\left| 1/2,1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,0\right\rangle \\ \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\left| 1/2, -1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,0\right\rangle - \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\left| 1/2,1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,-1\right\rangle

applying the highest weight scheme to this reduces space gives \left| 1/2, 1/2 \right\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\left| 1/2, -1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,1\right\rangle - \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\left| 1/2,1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,0\right\rangle \\ \left| 1/2, -1/2 \right\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\left| 1/2, -1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,0\right\rangle - \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\left| 1/2,1/2\right\rangle \left| 1,-1\right\rangle

Reference

Howard Georgi - Lie Algebras in Particle Physics